Beyond the Breaking Point? Survey Satisficing in Conjoint Experiments
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Validating vignette and conjoint survey experiments against real-world behavior.
Survey experiments, like vignette and conjoint analyses, are widely used in the social sciences to elicit stated preferences and study how humans make multidimensional choices. However, there is a paucity of research on the external validity of these methods that examines whether the determinants that explain hypothetical choices made by survey respondents match the determinants that explain wh...
متن کاملSymmetry Breaking: Satisficing Planning and Landmark Heuristics
Searching for computational tools that can further push the boundary of satisficing planning, we show that reasoning about state-space symmetries can substantially improve even the most effective heuristic-search satisficing planners, with respect to all standard performance measures. The improvement comes from the state-space pruning, as well as from transparent cost-to-state updates and heuri...
متن کاملOptimal designs for conjoint experiments
In conjoint experiments, each respondent receives a set of profiles to rate. Sometimes, the profiles are expensive prototypes that respondents have to test before rating them. Designing these experiments involves determining how many and which profiles each respondent has to rate and how many respondents are needed. To that end, the set of profiles offered to a respondent is treated as a separa...
متن کاملBeyond Conjoint Analysis: Advances in Preference Measurement
We identify gaps and propose several directions for future research in preference measurement. We structure our argument around a framework that views preference measurement as comprising three inter-related components: 1) the problem that the study is ultimately intended to address; 2) the design of the preference measurement task and the data collection approach; 3) the specification and esti...
متن کاملSatisficing Games: Moving Beyond Individual Rationality
Von Neumann-Morgenstern game theory is the multi-agent instantiation of individual rationality and is the standard for decision-making in group settings. Individual rationality, however, requires each player to optimize its own performance regardless of the effect so doing has on the other players, and does not accommodate a definitive notion of group preference. By replacing the demand for doi...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: SSRN Electronic Journal
سال: 2017
ISSN: 1556-5068
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2959146